Log in

No account? Create an account
"History repeats itself, the war will soon begin"
31st-Dec-2037 08:21 pm - [sticky post] General notice
Ready (alternative default)
Advise to all arriving visitors:

If you share extreme political right-wing points of view, in fact if you call yourself a November Alfa Zulu India and look for a comrade, I'd advise you to better leave my territory.
I am an armsman, but I am none of your kind.
Get clear of this before you add me to your list.

For the dangerous times' sake:

Descriptions of violence in this journal are either a rhetorical device (Stilmittel) to convey content or part of a discussion.
Any similarities to living persons given at any time are purely unintentional.
Ambitions to harm anyone in the reality are NEVER given.

Political partisanship:

I'm one of the many people which watch the processes inside the big clockwork, for the reasons that it's either their job or for private hobby interest.
If you wanna chase criminals planning to kill any living persons, go some other place!
You only get on the nerves of an ordinary person!

Another content note:

This is an NWO-free zone.
If you like to cling to this theory or the other likes, you've landed at the wrong space. Spreading of these kinds of contents is not desired as it is highly speculative substance whose proofs primarily work in the minds of their believers.
If not subject of an entry, there's no wish in discussing that matter or making it available to an audience.

About sharing:

If one writes openly, he needs to live with other entities reposting his content.
As long as no-one tries to generate personal gain (money, damage to others), I'll be okay with that.
Just one condition: Please ask me before reposting my content. This applies especially to artistic texts.
In other cases remains the possibility to link because links don't take away anything from the place it once was put out.
(Due to the recent EU copyright reform, I need to add some emphasis to this point.)

Anonymous commenting generally is enabled, unless spam occurred or somebody is trying hard to molest or have a fight.

Summer of Hardstyle 2017

Info about the campaign been here
and here.

I see with the eyes of a hunter
The recent obsession with “getting women into high representative offices” - tell you what it’s motivated by behind all this esoteric mumbo jumbo that they want to make believe.
On one hand, it’s enforcing a result what the reigning worldwide system (capitalism) didn’t deliver through the ways it’s designed until today - while there is a social demand for exactly that.
Instead of changing, which would make capitalism be no capitalism anymore, not in the way that the people which previously benefited the most from it continue to do so, they rather set up the plan to suggest the illusion of “okay, we gonna give this to you through enforcement with the crowbar” to get this demand superficially satisfied. “Superficially” because it’s a simple pattern of reigning through dogmatic decrees and entitling by favoring of mere physical features, instead of the previous pattern “sort out the most able for a job” (which is how capitalism, as well as any other system, stays capable to keep up itself). It’s not a realistic merit achieved by personal skills of character, it’s just an “accomplishment” like through a big famous name, connections or crawling up someone’s ass. Knowing who to give a blowjob to do a favor in order to get promoted.
On the other hand, it may be a tactic to activate a potential reserve of skilled workers which they’ve stopped investing a single penny in in the Western countries for several decades - now that they can already see the end of the brain drain from countries that still kept investing in the school education of its people because there are no skilled workers anymore in these, ready and willing to leave. They’ve already lured them all over to their side.
In other terms: If they still want some skilled workers to do the jobs, they’ve got to spend money again on some to actually become able to do so. The big pool they’ve stemmed from in the previous decades of alleged economic boom, it’s empty. Those people which can still come over, they aren’t the types of workers they look for in the Western world and they won’t ever be.
So, what to do? They rediscover their contingent of home-born women which they always tried to keep out of the job cycle because of conservative moral thinking.
But there is a twist - who promised eternal wealth before and told its women “just stay home, rely on a husband”, you can’t just switch the strategy like moving a lever and they all will go for the new craze now. Rather they gonna ask “What the heck is going on?! Why shall I contribute a share now so that I can live the way I do?! Previously things worked without that too!” - and this would be a rational and justified question.
By the way, the women which shall now enter the high ranks, portions of them discover how much the wheelings and dealings of this reigning system is not what they imagine as meaning of life, not what they wish to function like. So there is to make the strong guess large portions of them won’t behave as desired in order to fulfill that purpose which the big plan had intended them for.

Well, the important players of capitalism, knowing that their plan is going to fail, they already grab one of their jokers in this - and this is some method they always do: Let the manipulation machine spin restlessly.
Not just igniting and keeping the fire of gender war burning - also appointing a few sorted women into high positions by command immediately and staging that as “proof” of how their system is able though to deliver what society demands. This is what will be the “female quota”.
If there will be the abled ones among them, or not rather those who only know how to climb up a ladder in a hierarchy and which are eager for a big paycheck for the least amount of work to do, well, judge yourself...

So, basically in brief: This zeitgeisty mumbo jumbo currently is not much else than a trial of capitalism as it is to save its own ass for another time and go on living for some few years more.
In-depth, it’s just one big show - nothing really changes.
And as soon as it can already afford it again, this system’s gonna kick those women in their asses - just like after WWI and II as they maintained the structures of their respective home countries and helped rebuilding them again.
“Thank you for the job nicely done, but now get the fuck back to the kitchen and bear us a baby, we don’t need your work effort anymore!” - that’s what it’ll end in anytime.
(Mind you: The same like men have experienced if they worked of their ass for a firm for 20 years and then get fired during the next big mass dismissal for the shareholders’ dividend.)

Resource: https://matrixmann.livejournal.com/124412.html
20th-Jul-2019 12:00 pm - Erinnerung
Ready (alternative default)
Originally posted by matrixmann at Erinnerung

Mythos vom Widerstand.
Graf von Stauffenberg.

Die drohende Niederlage auf allen Fronten und Verlust von persönlichen Privilegien führte zu dem Beschluss, dass die dilettantische Führung liquidiert werden muss.

Myth about resistance.
Graf von Stauffenberg.

The threat of defeat on all fronts and possible loss of personal privileges lead to the decision that the dilettantish acting leader must be liquidated.
16th-Jul-2019 11:45 pm - Das nächste Level
Something's happened here...
Von der Leyen beerbt Jean-Claude Juncker und wird damit Präsidentin der EU-Kommission.
Im Verteidigungsministerium wird es, trotz des Postenwechsels, weiterhin eine "Flinten-Uschi" geben, sie wird nur "Annegret Krampf-Karrenbauer" (kurz: AKK) heißen.

Der Wahnsinn, der mit dem Personalkarussell der letzten Bundestagswahlen in Gang gesetzt wurde, geht also weiter...
Something's happened here...
Nach dem dritten Mal nun scheute man doch die öffentliche Blamage und stellte bei Frau Merkels nächster Begrüßungszeremonie sicherheitshalber zwei Stühle auf...
Tja... Mal sehen wie lang die Angelegenheit trotzdessen noch gut geht.
(Irgendwann könnte es ja auch einen Anfall in einer völlig anderen Situation geben oder die Sitzhaltung kann über den bestehenden Zustand auch nicht mehr hinweg täuschen.)
9th-Jul-2019 12:00 pm - Erinnerung
Ready (alternative default)
Originally posted by matrixmann at Erinnerung

2011: Splitting of Sudan.
Ready (alternative default)
Wisst ihr, was die eigentliche, wirkliche Ursache dafür ist, dass solche Großbrände wie gerade in Mecklenburg auf früheren Truppenübungsgeländen entstehen und außer Kontrolle geraten?
Auch das ist ein Nebeneffekt der jahrelangen Sparpolitik bezüglich der Bundeswehr.

Überall, wo Liegenschaften aufgegeben wurden, um den Wehretat zu schmälern, wurden die Ländereien an die umliegenden Gemeinden zurückgegeben und in deren Verantwortung übergeben.
Dass viele Kommunen ein schmales Haushaltsbudget haben, und darunter Dinge wie die zivilen Feuerwehren leiden, sei noch mal dahingestellt. Ist lange bekannt und kann man ausführlich betrachten, wenn die Dorffeuerwehr immer noch mit ihrem W50 kommen muss, weil das das leistungsstärkste Fahrzeug ist, was sie haben.

Das viel größere Problem an dieser Taktik des Bundes ist: Dadurch wurden Liegenschaften an das zivile Leben zurückübergeben, die munitionsversucht sind, die seit Jahrzehnten für Schießübungen genutzt wurden, manchmal sogar seit Jahrhunderten - es wurden Gelände zurückübergeben, die sogar im zweiten Weltkrieg Munition und Handgranaten produziert haben, deren Überreste auch heute noch in irgendeiner Form im Erdboden liegen und man nicht einschätzen kann wie reaktionsfreudig diese noch sind.
Um es kurz zu machen: Wenn es dort einmal brennen sollte, hat das zivile Leben, die zivile Feuerwehr, gar nicht die nötige Ausrüstung, um sich um solche Gebiete zu kümmern.
Die örtlichen Berufsfeuerwehren der Bundeswehr - diese konnten im Ernstfall über ganz andere Mittel und Nachschubmöglichkeiten verfügen um bei solchen Fällen gegen Brände auf frühren Armeegeländen vorzugehen. (Dazu zählen auch die sogenannten "Löschpanzer", die meist nur eine Umrüstung eines konventionellen Panzers sind.)
Mit dem Rückgabe der Liegenschaften der Bundeswehr an die örtlichem Kommunen wurden diese aber aufgelöst - man brauchte sie ja schließlich nicht mehr, wenn es keinen Standort gab, zu dem sie gehörten.

Und genau diese Konstellation rächt sich nun.
Eigentlich muss man sogar davon sprechen, dass es von Seiten des Staates unverantwortlich war, was sie getan haben.
Ob sie nun ihre Einrichtungen noch nutzen, sei völlig egal - es hätte unbeinträchtigt davon mindestens eine organisierte Nachsorge für diese Gebiete geben müssen, sodass diese nicht nach dem Weggang der Bundeswehr aus dem Gebiet zu einer tickenden Zeitbombe für das zivile Leben werden.
Das genau ist das, was jetzt passiert ist.
Was auch schon letzten Sommer passiert ist.
2nd-Jul-2019 01:30 am - Slut
Slut - what actually makes out a "slut"?
Is it the many partners he/she had intercourse with?
Is it the many people which he/she let touch his/her body, kissed?
Is it the style according to which he/she does all that?
Or just if he/she does it thoughtlessly - not making much selection between the people he/she does it with? Not taking care of protection from unwanted mother-/fatherhood/transmittable diseases?
What exactly is it that makes a person "slutty" compared to other people?

Socially, there are two standards for measuring: One originates from the interpretation of the term as "sloppy". Doing things sloppy and unfinished, or finished badly and not thoroughly enough, not taking enough care about one's looks and literally neglecting one's outside appearance.
The other definition originates from moral decay - acting hedonistically, selfishly, recklessly and ruthlessly. Primarily measured by one's mating behavior, including sexual intercourse.

So to say, by those definitions, a "slut" is a person which dresses and behaves trashy, whose self-respect is lowered, which acts too carelessly, doesn't invest too much energy into one thing, lives hastily and tends to flee from things after they don't give the right dosage of satisfaction anymore - "sluts" also tend to pickup the most in life regardless of if they'd be morally permitted to or not, rather than giving anything back in return.
In other words, "parasite", on the whole, would rather be a better synonym than just "someone who is promiscuous".

Tolerance and acceptance of promiscuity are cultural issues; Christian religion sanctioned it over centuries and linked it with shame, installing the one-partner-at-a-time exclusiveness that is still common in most of the world's areas.
This hasn't always been this way - this is a matter, a standard, which can be shifted and made to change again, just like it could be shifted to the standard that still is prevalent today. It is not unchangeable.
In earlier centuries more, but still of some relevance in the modern times, it had its practical purpose in order to create more safety for an individual's health and in order to prevent too much intra-familial incest - as the only safe contraception and block to diseases which spread by sexual intercourse for the general populace was simply not doing it.
Partner-exclusiveness through marriage and loyalty to its basic principle meant, two at the same time, that diseases couldn't spread that wildly (that is: if one was sick, he could only pass it on to one other person) and that children in a small community couldn't be that many half-siblings from both mother- and father-family-bloodline among themselves which they never got to know about until they chose a partner inside the community and had one unhealthy child after another with each other.

Today, technically, the need for this measure doesn't exist anymore. It's a question of money, of having access to as much contraception means as one needs for his/her lifestyle, and of human laziness to take care of it or not. Maybe of taboo - in certain circles - and of general sex education in certain proportions still too.
So... that entirely making out a "slut's" behavior is like an artificial standard now. And this needn't be exclusively limited to females.
There are ways meanwhile to practice promiscuity safely.

So... what is there else?
Maybe if he/she practices it without taking care of his/her own and their partner's physical integrity? If the person behaves irresponsibly against better knowledge and against the means available to him/her?
If a woman has three children from three different men differing in not so many years of age - if a man fathered 3 children with 3 different women during the same few years, for example?
If a couple keeps begetting a baby every year to keep their social benefits?

...Easier it is to answer if sticking to the definition of "doing one's job sloppily". Or with the circumstance of neglecting oneself's appearance fully voluntarily.
'Cause a job done badly doesn't always have anything to do with morals, which can be shaped individually and don't have to be objective. Disregard of personal hygiene or overacting in it in a perverted twisted way can follow a subjective pattern that doesn't have to be factually correct, but to a certain minimal extent, it also has an objective core which moving beyond may end up turning harmful for oneself as well as other people.
In other words: It's easier to find a common base and that doesn't always need to have to do with an individual's personal perspective.
Some negative personality traits, or behavior, just tends to cause always trouble, no matter where the individual pops up which shows them. And there even is more than subjective way to feel to it to perceive it like this.

So... what remains at the end of this?

There's more than meets the eye in one's current filter bubble if thinking things through more widely...
24th-Jun-2019 03:03 pm - Return to the gulf
Ready (alternative default)
The new campaign against Iran kind of leaves the impression like there's an unconditional need for the US to finally win a conflict again and push their interests through (after the several failed military campaigns, economic war attempts and coups d'état). Maybe even - or only - to achieve a second term for a president called Trump.
17th-Jun-2019 12:00 pm - Erinnerung
Ready (alternative default)
Originally posted by matrixmann at Erinnerung

Berlin, 17. Juni 1953: Traue nicht deinem Geschichtsbuch.

Berlin, June 17th 1953: Don't trust your history book.

14th-Jun-2019 03:07 pm - Mehrwegnetze
I see with the eyes of a hunter
Die richtige Idee (seltsam - die DDR wurde dafür mal ausgelacht, dass in ihr keine gratis Einweg-Plastiktüten bei Obst und Gemüse bereitstellt gab, sondern sie diese wiederverwendbaren Netze hatten) - enttäuschend an ihnen allerdings: Wenn man auf die Verpackung schaut, aus welchem Material die Netze oft gemacht sind, ist es wie als wenn man in einem Topf voll Ironie badet oder bei der versteckten Kamera gelandet ist - auch nur Plastik.
Wiederbenutzbares und waschbares Plastik gegen Einwegplastik. Sehr guter Austausch!
Es soll zwar auch welche aus Baumwolle geben, bisher scheint das aber nicht so verbreitet zu sein, denn bisher sind mir solche noch nicht untergekommen. Die wären nämlich eher die bevorzugte Wahl, weil es hier nicht nur um die Vermeidung von Plastikmüll geht, sondern auch darum, dass man nicht selbst Plastik mitisst. Was man nämlich jedes Mal tut, wenn man Lebensmittel konsumiert, die vorher in Plastik eingepackt waren - und das auch bei Mehrwegnetzen aus Plastik.

Aber was soll man auch erwarten... Die Industrie, die seit ca. 50 Jahren schon damit beschäftigt ist, Plastik zu produzieren und es in den Umlauf zu bringen (chemische und Erdölindustrie), erwartet man ehrlich, dass diese sich kampflos ergibt und ihre Profite leichten Herzens davonschwimmen lässt? Wohl eher nicht.
Darum kriegt jeder weiterhin Plastik vorgesetzt - nur mit grüner Marketingkampagne. Damit die Sorglosigkeit weiter geht.
3rd-Jun-2019 06:06 pm - Zerfallserscheinungen
Ready (alternative default)
Wie sich jetzt auch Nahles aus der Frontlinie zurückzieht (und die SPD dem weiteren Selbstzerstörungskurs überlässt), wird man als äußerer Betrachter den Anschein nicht los, dass, im übertragenen Sinne, "die Ratten das sinkende Schiff verlassen".
12th-May-2019 07:40 pm - Millennials' cross
Dark (1)
Little reminder to all adults:

What do you think how kids imagine the world can be changed if they recognize they live in circumstances of systematic disadvantage, if they've been born in times of peace and drastic upheavals, to them, are only a matter they know from history books or tales of their grandparents? What solution you want them to get to if all they know is "obey, make no trouble and you'll be rewarded"?
This page was loaded Jul 23rd 2019, 6:21 pm GMT.