Advise to all arriving visitors:
If you share extreme political right-wing points of view, in fact if you call yourself a November Alfa Zulu India and look for a comrade, I'd advise you to better leave my territory.
I am an armsman, but I am none of your kind.
Get clear of this before you add me to your list.
For the dangerous times' sake:
Descriptions of violence in this journal are either a rhetorical device (Stilmittel) to convey content or part of a discussion.
Any similarities to living persons given at any time are purely unintentional.
Ambitions to harm anyone in the reality are NEVER given.
I'm one of the many people which watch the processes inside the big clockwork, for the reasons that it's either their job or for private hobby interest.
If you wanna chase criminals planning to kill any living persons, go some other place!
You only get on the nerves of an ordinary person!
Another content note:
This is an NWO-free zone.
If you like to cling to this theory or the other likes, you've landed at the wrong space. Spreading of these kinds of contents is not desired as it is highly speculative substance whose proofs primarily work in the minds of their believers.
If not subject of an entry, there's no wish in discussing that matter or making it available to an audience.
If one writes openly, he needs to live with other entities reposting his content.
As long as no-one tries to generate personal gain (money, damage to others), I'll be okay with that.
Just one condition: Please ask me before reposting my content.
This applies especially to artistic texts.
In other cases remains the possibility to link because links don't take away anything from the place it once was put out.
(Due to the recent EU copyright reform, I need to add some emphasis to this point.)
Anonymous commenting generally is enabled, unless spam occurred or somebody is trying hard to molest or have a fight.
Summer of Hardstyle 2017 Info about the campaign been here and here.
To link "going to war" with "dying for one’s country" is so much last century thinking...
You don’t need to get down onto such abstract emotional bullshit to find a reason to fight actively.
Better think of it as "I don’t care about the flag I go to war for, they gonna lie to me anyway - I fight so that me, my loved ones and my neighbor can go on living in peace".
Critical question towards the intersectionalists and Identity Politics fanatics: What do you actually mean if you talk about "white"? Which kind of people are all included in this?
Is it only Central Europeans? Do people from Asia fall into the same category for you too?
What about Eastern Europeans or Russians? Or about Italians, Spaniards, Greeks?
Does "white" mean "all non-black people" - or is it the title only for a particular group of people (among "whites")?
And, if talking about "black" - what are you thinking of in that point? Does this include only sub-Saharan Africans - or also people with a comparable dark skin tone (like e. g. Cubans)?
Or is everyone automatically "black" if he cannot fit the category "white"? If his skin tone is too dark for that?
As protests in Hong Kong became a steady topic in Western media in the recent weeks again:
Let's propose a critical question - what do the protesters actually aim for? Why do they fight China's taking-over of the territory?
All of that what they criticize to happen from China's side of things has been formally recorded in a couple of documents made long time ago between the British government and the PRC as part of returning Hong Kong to China which it once was taken from by them as a colony.
So, with fighting that, who do the protesters think will maintain their province instead and make the laws for it if China's reign is not desired?
So this can only mean targeting a return under the British crown.
Think about it...
People fighting for staying a colony!
Of course they won't mention this in your allegedly peace-, freedom- and democracy-loving Western media - as it's like a recently-created new form of sport to shoot darts at China whenever a possibility shows up to do so (especially for America under Trump).
Talking about a former colony actually wanting to stay a colony (judging by the deeds of the activists on the streets), this would be a very strange topic to report about with a subtle psychological undertone of joy.
- Tags:controversial, devil in disguise, journalism, krieg, lake, menschen, networks, non-state forces, politik, system, violence, west vs. east
One thing for the record of those likes which think of encouraging policemen and soldiers to walk around some more in their service uniforms in their free time: Uniforms won’t make it any safer. They’re just pieces of clothes. It’s deeds that count.
Of course there will be some people who, on average, will shrink back from doing anything improperly - but, don’t get that fooled to think that the heavy criminals will get scared enough of punishment to abstain from their usual business only because they deem a person dressed in a martial uniform near them.
More likely it’ll be those people which harbor an established respect towards uniform carriers, despite doing something improper, who cease to do these things in proximity to their eyes.
What have you won then? Nothing.
It’s just a cosmetic issue to pretend an image of safety which doesn’t exist still.
(Technically, even everyone could slip into a martial uniform-like dress giving people that psychological impression.)
"Wanting to protect the world climate, you have to face one important fact: Economic growth (in the Western world) still and trying to only stop the man-made destruction of nature are two things which don't fit together. They're paths running into opposite directions.
To really turn back the cogs of time in order to spare yourself and future generations the worst means you have to go back towards the living standard of the 70s of the wealthy nations and the world population has to halve at least, if you want every human to have the same wealthy living standard. Nothing going in there anymore with "I want my lovely two kids per relationship" - NO! To say it really evil: At best you even die before you get 40, and at best you didn't leave behind a child until then.
That's how drastic it is.
And the healthier people want to be personally, the less people can walk on earth enjoying it as their lifestyle.
You ask why the animals die out and keep disappearing? Think for a minute: Who conquered the living space that was taken away from them? Who occupies the space they lived in before? Seven and a half billion answers are walking out there. Human species took that territory, spreading like a virus. Where humans live, barely other animals live in anymore.
So... you get it what even more "growth" would mean for the environment, for the nature of this planet?"
- Tags:controversial, economy, environment, gesundheit, grünismus, history, life, menschen, reform, survival, system, technology
A thing to remember when dealing a lot with politics: Never forget the personal level. Never forget how you feel yourself about a subject.
Don't let an ideology or concept narrow your view or dictate the interpretation of personal experiences you made.
If just one concept doesn't have all the answers or seems to be wrong, accept it, find your way to handle it.
None of them were thrown to the earth by a higher entity, so none of them stem from universal knowledge or rightfulness.
They've been created by humans, so therefore they're also as flawed as them.
Ein klein wenig merkt man, dass eine Komplettlegalisierung von Hanf der Konsumgüterindustrie sehr in den Kram passen würde.
Selbst begegnet ist einem schon Hanf-Schinken, Hanftee, Hanföl (Speiseöl) - CBD-Produkte noch nicht, aber im Rahmen von "Nahrungsergänzungsmitteln" sollen die auch schon legal im Umlauf sein. Wer weiß, was nicht eventuell noch...
Und das ist erst seit vergleichbar kurzer Zeit der Fall.
Hanfseile in der Schifffahrt oder Hanfschnüre im Klempnerhandwerk (um Gewinde und Verschraubungen abzudichten) sind dagegen regelrecht ein alter Hut...
Also, wenn das nächste Mal eine Diskussion über das Thema losgehen sollte, leider wird es den Beigeschmack nicht los, dass es hierbei weniger um "wir wollen den Leuten etwas gutes tun" (was bestimmte Bestandteile des Hanfs, abseits von THC, durchaus tun) als um potentielles Geschäft geht.
- Tags:controversial, deutsch, devil in disguise, economy, food, gesundheit, journalism, life, politik, reform, system
The recent obsession with “getting women into high representative offices” - tell you what it’s motivated by behind all this esoteric mumbo jumbo that they want to make believe.
On one hand, it’s enforcing
a result what the reigning worldwide system (capitalism) didn’t deliver through the ways it’s designed until today - while there is a social demand for exactly that
Instead of changing, which would make capitalism be no capitalism anymore, not in the way that the people which previously benefited the most from it continue to do so, they rather set up the plan to suggest the illusion of “okay, we gonna give this to you through enforcement with the crowbar” to get this demand superficially
satisfied. “Superficially” because it’s a simple pattern of reigning through dogmatic decrees and entitling by favoring of mere physical features, instead of the previous pattern “sort out the most able for a job” (which is how capitalism, as well as any other system, stays capable to keep up itself). It’s not a realistic merit achieved by personal skills of character, it’s just an “accomplishment” like through a big famous name, connections or crawling up someone’s ass. Knowing who
to give a blowjob
to do a favor in order to get promoted.
On the other hand, it may be a tactic to activate a potential reserve of skilled workers which they’ve stopped investing a single penny in in the Western countries for several decades - now that they can already see the end of the brain drain from countries that still kept investing in the school education of its people because there are no skilled workers anymore in these, ready and willing to leave. They’ve already lured them all
over to their side.
In other terms: If they still want some skilled workers to do the jobs, they’ve got to spend money again on some to actually become able to do so. The big pool they’ve stemmed from in the previous decades of alleged economic boom, it’s empty
. Those people which can still come over, they aren’t the types of workers they look for in the Western world and they won’t ever be.
So, what to do? They rediscover their contingent of home-born women which they always tried to keep out of the job cycle because of conservative moral thinking.
But there is a twist - who promised eternal wealth before and told its women “just stay home, rely on a husband”, you can’t just switch the strategy like moving a lever and they all will go for the new craze now. Rather they gonna ask “What the heck is going on?! Why shall I contribute a share now so that I can live the way I do?! Previously things worked without that too!” - and this would be a rational and justified question.
By the way, the women which shall now enter the high ranks, portions of them discover how much the wheelings and dealings of this reigning system is not what they imagine as meaning of life, not what they wish to function like. So there is to make the strong guess large portions of them won’t behave as desired in order to fulfill that purpose which the big plan had intended them for.
Well, the important players of capitalism, knowing that their plan is going to fail, they already grab one of their jokers in this - and this is some method they always do: Let the manipulation machine spin restlessly.
Not just igniting and keeping the fire of gender war burning - also appointing a few sorted women into high positions by command immediately and staging that as “proof” of how their system is able though to deliver what society demands. This is what will be the “female quota”.
If there will be the abled ones among them, or not rather those who only know how to climb up a ladder in a hierarchy and which are eager for a big paycheck for the least amount of work to do, well, judge yourself...
So, basically in brief: This zeitgeisty mumbo jumbo currently is not much else than a trial of capitalism as it is to save its own ass for another time and go on living for some few years more.
In-depth, it’s just one big show - nothing really changes.
And as soon as it can already afford it again, this system’s gonna kick those women in their asses - just like after WWI and II as they maintained the structures of their respective home countries and helped rebuilding them again.
“Thank you for the job nicely done, but now get the fuck back to the kitchen and bear us a baby, we don’t need your work effort anymore!” - that’s what it’ll end in anytime.
(Mind you: The same like men have experienced if they worked of their ass for a firm for 20 years and then get fired during the next big mass dismissal for the shareholders’ dividend.)
Originally posted by matrixmann
Mythos vom Widerstand.
Graf von Stauffenberg.
Die drohende Niederlage auf allen Fronten und Verlust von persönlichen Privilegien führte zu dem Beschluss, dass die dilettantische Führung liquidiert werden muss.
Myth about resistance.
Graf von Stauffenberg.
The threat of defeat on all fronts and possible loss of personal privileges lead to the decision that the dilettantish acting leader must be liquidated.